Austin 2012 – Part One. Pitching challenges, parties and Terry Rossio on Revisions…

I’ve been putting off blogging for a few days, partly because there is so much to write (arrggghh!!) and also because it’s been crazy since I got back from Austin. But now I’m determined to get this blogging shit back on track!

First of all, a big thumbs up and best of luck to Chas Fisher, an Australian writer/director who I met up with over the last few weeks. He has an excellent blog here, which covers his projects and his recent trip to the States. Basically, Chas attempted to do in 3 weeks what I’ve been trying to do in 3 months, and he managed to do a scary (but impressive) amount of stuff while he was here. Have a look – his schedule was pretty busy, but it’s an inspiration!

So, Austin. Going to AFF this year was kind of weird because a. I’ve always gone there from Ireland before and b. it’s usually been the ONLY time I have to meet people in the U.S. industry. So it was strange going there from L.A., having spent a few months meeting industry types.

This did make me a bit more chilled-out about the whole thing, but it has to be said too, there weren’t AS many reps or producers there this time round. At least, that was how it felt. I must get my old AFF festivals programs when I get home and see if my suspicions are correct. There was a different, less career-desperate vibe. People actually relaxed and went out to chat and get hammered.

There were a lot of other writers there, though, both famous and not-at-all famous. And to be honest, the reps tend to show up and split early anyway, in case some writer should actually ask them to represent them ;)

I arrived in Austin on the Wednesday and spent the first night saying hallo to a few familiar faces and availing of the 2 for 1 hamburger deal at Huts. I highly recommend Huts, even if you have just the one burger – they’re excellent.

Thursday, my friend Frank kindly took me to The Salt Lick, an Austin barbecue institution that’s about 30 minutes outside town. I’d never been there before cos I’m too chicken to drive in Texas, but that hadn’t stopped me featuring Th’ Lick in a screenplay I wrote set in Austin. It was a big relief to get there and see that it really was just like I’d pictured it. They have the best barbecue meat I’ve ever tasted, and their sauce is to die for (not literally).

I should have had an early night and practiced my pitch, for I was pitching the next morning. But I’m not that sensible a girl. So instead I went to the Driskill Bar and talked for hours, then went to two parties. I’m ashamed to say that I only went back to the hotel when a (very sensible) friend heard I was pitching the next day and grabbed the wine glass out of my hand. Thanks Cathy!

I was pitching Last Girl Standing, a script that reached the top 10% in this year’s AFF screenwriting competition. The pitch on Friday morning actually went well in that I managed to finish it in 90 seconds and did not have any blips in delivery. The problem was – and it’s amazing how hard it is to see this yourself – that it was all set-up and no meat! All Act 1 and not enough Act 2. And especially in a comedy, where all the funny bits are in Act 2, this is a disaster.

The two judges – Amy Talkington and Pamela Ribon – gave me some great tips on how to improve it and were generally lovely. The other pitch contenders were also the friendliest I’ve ever come across at AFF and some of them are people I know I’ll be in contact with for a long time. A shout-out to the poor guy with the massive head cold who had to pitch despite being smothered. That was brave!

Then it was into Terry Rossio’s second annual workshop on Revisions. Last year’s workshop taught me a ton so I had high hopes for this one.

The big note that he stresses again and again is: Believe your script can get better. Don’t settle when it’s “okay” or even “good”. Aim for “great”!

Here was the main gist of his advice during the session – I hope some of it helps you as much as it’s helped me:

  • Your scene doesn’t start until your character’s “want” is revealed. Or until the situational dilemma is understood.
  • You have an opening image, a key moment and a “throw” (or transition). Figure out what these are, protect them and enhance them.
  • A scene ideally exists to make a single story point. Character points are not the same – a scene can have any number of these. But any more than one story point and things are going to get confusing.
  • With performance dialogue, the shorter the better. Silence between words provides an opportunity for the actors. Too many words restricts them.
  • Actors also hate question marks as it locks them into a rising vocal. Try to make questions into statements if you can – it’s stronger anyway.
  • What he was going through with us was polishing your script – he advises doing a rough draft, leaving it for a while, then rewriting. Rinse and repeat. Then he reads the script several times and when nothing jumps out or feels awkward, when it reads perfectly, then and only then is it done.

Terry showed us his desktop on the big screen and how it’s laid out. He advises giving each screenwriting project a unique icon, even a drawing or image that you’ve done specially for it. Somehow, it helps him “will” his projects into existence!

He writes in sequences with his partner, and showed us the 36 sequences for their latest script. They’re color-coded, with the red ones being unfinished, the yellow ones totally completed, etc.

The other really fascinating thing he showed us were pitch materials he and Ted Eliott use with their script pitches in conjunction with their story board. These included drawings, other artwork, even a full animation that they commissioned to give the execs the right feel for their story. As he pointed out, your competition will be doing this stuff, so you should too!

As I said, last year’s session was fascinating and this year’s was just as good. Terry went through a few people’s script excerpts on screen and once again, “re-wrote” them. You learn a huge amount just by watching him do his thing, and the effort he puts into making things perfect is massive.

Then it was into roundtables, with mostly TV writers. Now, I’m thinking of writing something for TV, but like (I suspect) a lot of writers back home, I don’t have any TV specs. So this session was right up my street.

TV writer Christine Boylan advised us to write both an original TV pilot AND a TV spec.

Her advice:

Don’t worry about it being produce-able, write what you want to see on TV. What show is just not being made, but should be? They’re looking for a unique voice, so write something that will get the execs’ attention.

Do 6-10 sample scripts for follow-on episodes. But mainly, have a clear idea for what’s going to happen during the rest of the series.

Break down episodes of existing TV shows and try to establish what’s happening. How are they structured?

Comedy writer Paul Simms advised us to look at each scene and ask ourselves: if you took out all the jokes, would it still work as a drama?

TV is more absurd than real life, so if you’re basing your show on real-life experiences, you’re going to have to heighten them a bit. Don’t make them TOO realistic.

He said some wise words – write every day, especially when you don’t feel inspired. As with jogging, skipping days is fatal! (As a runner, I can unfortunately confirm this is true).

When pitching your show, keep it short and stick to the most important details. Try and find some way to get the execs involved, get them inspired by your idea. The more questions they’re asking, the better.

We also met a film writer (who will remain nameless) whose script was recently made into a hard-hitting film, but only after the script was butchered and rewritten by the director. It then bombed at the box office, which should be a lesson to that studio (but probably won’t be). This is sadly a story I hear every time I go to AFF! Hollywood, firing the writer will NOT fix the script!

Friday night, there was a barbecue at the French Legation that was as good as always and  a crazy party at Ruth’s Chris Steakhouse that led to a LOT of hangover the next day. The less said the better!!!

I’ll update tomorrow and Wednesday with what transpired on the Saturday and Sunday and since I got back to L.A. – there’s more, much more…

May the writing frenzy begin…

I’m gearing up to take part in Script Frenzy next month. In case you haven’t heard of it, the Frenzy is all about signing up to write 100 pages of script in 30 days. This is similar to the challenge each November where people try to write a novel (or more likely, a novella) in a month.

Now, clearly with something like this there’s gonna be a bit of brain-dumping. The script you write in 30 days will be a rough first draft, or if it’s a big rewrite, an intermediary draft. I like the Frenzy idea because I have a big problem with thinking, not writing, and a challenge like this forces me to switch my brain off and just get stuff down on the page. As a wise person once said, you can fix stuff that’s written down, not stuff that’s only in your head. Or words to that effect.

That having been said, there’s no reason why you can’t plan properly for your brain vomit. Starting off with an outline will not only help you to write your script, but will make the end result a lot less unwieldy. I haven’t worked out every single scene for the script I’m planning to write, Last Girl Standing, but I know enough to keep me on track and prevent roadblocks.

Also, be realistic. You will find it tough to hit 100 pages in a month unless you’re writing regularly. So if you’re going on holiday for a week during Script Frenzy or planning a lot of socializing next month, this time around might not be for you. Ideally try and do it evenly – crank out 3-4 pages a day, every day.

Use the guilt factor to your advantage – paste your daily results on the Frenzy’s website. This will keep you accountable and hopefully keep you on target. I’ll be doing this and posting links on Facebook just to prove that I haven’t chickened out (I’m being really hopeful here). Give it a go – what have you got to lose?

In other news, there are 12 days left until our Fundit campaign for Tiger is over and we still have €1,030 to raise. Check out the trailer here if you have a few bucks and fancy having your name in some movie credits…

 

When Terry Rossio rewrites your scene…

One of the best panels at the Austin Film Festival last October was a two-hour session screenwriter Terry Rossio did on rewriting. People taking part (there was maybe 50 of us) were asked to submit a page and a half from one from their scripts in advance. He then went through a couple of the submitted scenes on screen, with some participation from the group, and demonstrated several different ways of rewriting them.

On the one hand, I was dying for him to pick my scene. On the other, how terrifying is it to have someone go through your script in front of everyone? So I sat there sweating, half-hoping, half-not-hoping.  Anyway, in the end 2 hours flew by and he didn’t have time to do more than 4 or 5 scenes. BUT – he promised to do a re-write of each person’s scene and send them back to us by email. One for everybody in the audience.

I didn’t really believe that he’d do it. I mean, doesn’t he have much bigger fish – and much bigger scripts – to fry? But I was wrong, because a rewrite of my scene landed in my inbox two days ago.

I’ve decided to post both my original version and his version for educational purposes. Because Terry Rossio knows a hell of a lot more about screenwriting than I do, so surely he can teach us all a few things about writing a good scene?

So here’s the scene I chose to submit – it’s a (frankly, very corny) midpoint scene from my script Searching for Summer.

INT – OLD PECAN COFFEE BAR – NIGHT

Summer sits at the back with Rachel, Carrie and Emily. The bar is full of a rowdy crowd who are singing along with the band.

Up on stage Shane is enthusiastically murdering a U2 song, flanked by his college-age band. He finishes to a cacophony of cheers and boos and bows, grinning.

SHANE

Thanks for the support!

More catcalls.

SHANE (CONT’D)

Up next is someone with a much better set of pipes! Sandra, where are you?

EMILY

She’s here! Go, Sandra!

Summer freezes in her seat, looking terrified. Shane spots her.

SHANE

Come on up! Folks, Sandra only moved here three weeks ago so give her a warm welcome!

The noisy crowd cheers.

RACHEL (As she passes)

Summer, you’re gonna be great!

Summer makes her way to the stage like a woman facing execution. Shane puts his hand over the mic when he sees how scared she is.

SHANE

You okay? Don’t worry, they’re in a good mood tonight.

Summer nods in apprehension.

SHANE (CONT’D)

What are you gonna sing?

SUMMER

Ruby Tuesday.

Shane uncovers the mic.

SHANE

Here’s Sandra with a classic -Ruby Tuesday!!

The crowd cheers as the band starts to play the intro. Summer steps up and starts to sing. Her voice is quiet and cracks from nerves. She’s barely audible. The crowd go a bit more silent as people strain to hear her.

ROWDY GUY

Sing up!

ANOTHER GUY

We can’t hear you!!

Someone laughs. Summer falters.

She stares out at the room full of people, all looking at her, some expectantly, some in derision.

She looks around: beside her, holding his guitar, Shane looks nervous. In the audience, Rachel has her hand over her mouth…

Determination suddenly floods into Summer’s face. She starts to sing again, this time loudly and confidently. Her voice is strong and slightly bluesy, an unexpected sound.

The crowd cheers and the pro in Summer comes out as she starts to work the crowd, getting them to sing the second chorus along with her. The bar is full of sound as everyone sings at once. The song is suddenly over and Summer stops, beaming.

The crowd goes crazy as people chant, “More, more, more!” Summer smiles at Rachel, who’s cheering, and at Shane, who staring at her in amazement.

And this is the Terry Rossio version of the same page and a half:

INT – OLD PECAN COFFEE BAR – NIGHT

A rowdy crowd sings along with the band. Summer watches from a booth in the back, with Rachel, Carrie and Emily. 

ON STAGE, Shane enthusiastically murders a U2 song, flanked by his band. He finishes to a cacophony of cheers and boos. 

SHANE

Thanks for the support!

(more catcalls) 

Up next, someone with a better set of pipes! Sandra, where are you? 

EMILY

She’s here! Go, Sandra!

Summer looks terrified. Shane spots her. 

SHANE

Come on up! Folks, Sandra moved here three weeks ago! 

The crowd CHEERS. Summer rises – 

RACHEL 

Summer, you’re gonna be great!

Summer leads herself to her own execution. Shane notes her fear, puts his hand over the mic. 

SHANE

It’s a good crowd. They love you already. What are you gonna sing? 

SUMMER

Ruby Tuesday? 

Shane uncovers the mic.

SHANE

Here’s Sandra with a classic, Ruby Tuesday! 

The crowd CHEERS as the band slides into the intro. Summer steps up and sings. 

Her voice is quiet and cracks from nerves. Barely audible. The crowd quiets as people strain to hear her. 

ROWDY GUY

Louder! 

ANOTHER GUY

We can’t hear you!!

Someone laughs.

Summer falters. She stares out at the room full of people, all staring, some smiling and hopeful, others already starting to smirk, ready to turn. 

Beside her, holding his guitar, Shane nods, already into the music. In the audience, Rachel holds a hand over her mouth. 

Determination floods into Summer’s features. 

She starts to sing again. Loud, clear, and confident. Her voice is strong and bluesy, an unexpected sound. 

Yells of approval, and the pro in Summer emerges. She works the crowd. They join in for the second chorus. 

ANGLE – THE BAR, rocking and rolling, everyone sings at once, having a good time. 

The song is suddenly done. Summer beams as the crowd applauds, then chant, “one more, one more, one more!” 

Summer catches Rachel’s eye, cheering with the rest of them, then notices next to her, Shane, who stares at her, halfway to falling in love. 

First thing is, his version is much shorter. And this is a good thing. There’s a lot more meat for a lot less fat.

I like the way he capitalises the important noises like the CHEERS – this is something I’m always forgetting to do but it really makes those bits jump out at you.

And it’s also a lot more definite – Sandra “leads herself to her own execution”, she’s not “like a woman facing execution”. The crowd is “ready to turn”, not just “looking at her with derision”. And Shane’s reaction at the end – that this is where he starts to fall in love with her – is clearly marked. Which is at it should be, because it’s an important moment.

I had two reactions to seeing his rewrite. One was to admire his work and the other was “I want the rest of the script to be that good!” So it’s off to the coal face – the real work is beginning….

Thanks a million to Terry Rossio – and to the AFF for setting up the rewrite session. It should be fours hours this year!

Allowing your characters to drive the plot….

The pre-pre-production prep for Tiger is rattling on – I’m going to see a possible location this Thursday evening with the director and the DoP. We’ve cast one of the child roles and have a few leads on some female teenagers who could do the other role.

The fundraising quiz has been organised, as has the networking party at Four Dame Lane on 2nd February. So now it’s just a case of getting some prizes together – and hoping and praying that enough people show up to both events!

Apart from all that, I’m in the middle of a fairly extensive rewrite. So extensive that I’ve thrown out most of the original script and am starting with a semi-blank page. Now, I knew how the new script would start, and how it would end. But I had no idea what was to happen in between!

My tactic – and this is the only way I know, but I’m open to other people’s ideas – was to try to identify a possible mid-point for each of the main characters, and then work on getting them from the start to the middle and from the middle to the end of the script.

Also, it helps to put yourself in the shoes of each of the characters and ask: what would they do next? How would they feel and react about the situation they find themselves in? This will help drive the plot, which should be coming about at least partly because of the characters’ decisions and their personalities anyway.

If you get lost, ask your characters. They’ll know which way to go!

A confession… and my thoughts on Save the Cat

First, a confession. I had originally planned to head to L.A. in January 2012. BUT – I’ve just had a month of unemployment, after going to two U.S. films festivals. Oops. March next year is now looking like a more realistic timeframe. But the dream is still alive – temporary unemployment will not stop me from hitting Hollywood in the near(ish) future!

After my experiment last month, I thought I’d review another book on screenwriting. There are many of them out there, but how many are any good? Next up is a classic – Blake Snyder’s Save the Cat.

A lot of people reckon Save the Cat promotes formulaic popcorn movies, and there is some truth in this. The late Mr Snyder himself admits in an early chapter that this is not a book for anyone interested in writing indie or arthouse films. This is a book on writing mainstream studio movies.

He insists that you should start by asking “What is it?” and nailing your film’s logline. Condense your idea into a logline and practice it on people until you’re sure that it’s a winner. Does your idea sound like something Joe Average will want to watch on Saturday night? Will it make him leave his sofa and pay for a cinema ticket and some overpriced snacks?

Snyder then goes through the “10 genres that every movie ever made can be categorized by”. These include Monster in the House (a horror genre), The Golden Fleece (usually used for adventure movies), etc. (I’ve tried to rack my brains and come up with a film that doesn’t fit one of his genres, but in vain. If you can, more power to you!) Hollywood tends to want something that’s “the same, only different!” and this chapter is all about defining your story and coming up with a fresh twist on an existing genre.

Next, make sure that you have the right hero for your story – and the right villain, who should be the hero’s perfect foil. Like Joseph Campbell, Snyder is big on Jungian archetypes – the wise mentor, the eager young man – and how to use these stock characters in your script. As many movie stars tend to be associated with certain types of roles, this can also help producers imagine your characters better. But as with the genres, Snyder emphasises how important it is to give the archetypes a new twist or angle.

The next two chapters are probably the most controversial – they involve “beating out” your movie by filling in a sheet of 15 beats (i.e. opening image, setting the scene, the call to action, the B-plot, “fun and games” which tends to be the first part of Act 2, etc). Once you have defined your 15 beats, you then outline the movie using index cards and “build” your story of approximately 40 scenes.

When you’re sure that you’ve built the perfect outline, then and only then do you start writing the script.

Snyder has been accused of making scriptwriting formulaic – and I’m sure a lot of writers were horrified to see a script reduced down to nuts and bolts like this. BUT, I do think it’s essential when you’re starting out to have some sort of guiding structure, and this is exactly what you get from Snyder’s beat sheet. Also, from filling out the 40 scene cards, you get a clear idea of which acts are overloaded, which ones are too light and where you may be going wrong overall.

Laurence Kasdan said in Austin this year that he studied playwriting at college and that the 3-Act structure was therefore embedded in his brain. He doesn’t even have to think about it anymore. This is basically just a more cinematic version.

The bottom line: Save the Cat is well worth a read when you’re starting out in screenwriting, as it gives you all the structural basics you’re ever going to need. All this and he has great names for scriptwriting missteps, like “Too Much Marzipan” and “Watch out for That Glacier!” RIP Mr Snyder, you’ll be missed…